Sign up for what's been called "the smartest woodworking newsletter."
Stories, analysis, and resources for restoring and using wooden planes.
Here's what readers are saying.

The Ohio Tool Co. (Briefly) Paid Its Convict Workers

For a lucky few it was highly lucrative
Logo used by Ohio Tool after its 1893 merger with the Auburn Tool Co.

I’m currently in the middle of a big research project on prison plane making, and I stumbled on the records for overwork payments the Ohio Tool Co. made to convicts at the Ohio State Penitentiary. Ohio Tool was one of the largest plane making firms of the 19th century. It used convict labor from its founding in 1851 until 1894.1

Under the contract labor system, a company paid the state a set rate for the work convicts did in the firm’s prison workshop. In the late 1860s, Ohio Tool paid between $0.52 and $0.70 per man per day.2 (To put that in perspective, carpenters in Ohio in 1867 made $2.50 a day.3) But under the overwork system, which was in place from 1857 to 1867, contractors paid convicts for any piece work they did that exceeded that day’s quota.

By law, contractors were supposed to pay the same amount for overwork as they did for contract labor. In practice, however, prices for overwork varied based on the type of work performed. The money was held by the state and disbursed either to the prisoner or their family. Convicts also used their earnings to buy books.4

The intent of the overwork system was to help convicts restart their lives at the conclusion of their sentence. At the time, convicts were given $5 on their release, not even enough to get home for many of them. They earned a pitiful rate for overwork, but they left prison with potentially what was then a sizable chunk of cash.

For instance, in the 1866/1867 fiscal year, 162 men and women were paid a total of $8,072 for overwork; almost 65% earned more than $10. For a few it was highly lucrative, with the top 10 earners making between $108 and $298 (or $2,268 and $6,258 in 2026 dollars).5

Fiscal Year OTC convict labor OTC overwork Total overwork
1858 $8,457.60 $289.62 $4,038.51
1863 $6,994.91 $863.87 $6,970.79
1864 $4,992.17 $1,155.42 $7,232.26
1866 $11,258.61 $1,664.52 $10,695 93
1867 $13,758.40 $1,357.22 $8,073.62
Payments Ohio Tool Co. made to the state for convict labor and overwork, as well as the total amount of overwork convicts in all workshops earned that year.

Unfortunately, the overwork records don’t include which workshop prisoners were in. And it’s unknown what jobs Ohio Tool approved for overwork. Planes were its main focus, but that’s not all convicts in its workshop made. The company’s contracts in 1868 covered the manufacture of trunk slats, wood-frame saws, skates, “carpenters’, joiners’, cabinet-makers’, wheelwrights’ and coopers’ tools; and all the tools used by mechanics working in wood,” as well as the “grinding and filing of plane irons and mechanics’ edge tools.”6

Some contractors liked the overwork system, including Ohio Tool’s secretary and treasurer. “I thought it had a good effect upon the men,” he remembered in 1877. Not everyone agreed. The contractor who ran the carriage-making workshop complained that convicts “were continually quarreling about prices.” “We had to keep account with almost every prisoner,” he said, “and he thought he was crowded down, or else he wanted to get a day’s work that he could do in two or three hours. He would complain if he could not, and then would want to put a big price on his over-work, so that there was a sort of contention all the way through.”7

Overwork, also called over-stent or over-stint, was also allowed at various times at Auburn State Prison in New York, where contract plane making also took place. But it was mostly an ad hoc system dependent on the whims of each contractor. Some contractors only let a small group of convicts in a workshop do overwork. An 1867 state report called those “discriminations” an “endless source of discontent, jealousy, heart-burning and deception. They were the occasion of no small proportion of all the punishments inflicted in the prisons.8

It’s perhaps no surprise that Ohio eventually repealed the law allowing overwork. Convicts returned to working six 10 hour days, and getting $5 when they were released. If you’re interested in prison plane making, back in 2022 I wrote about the conditions convicts worked under in A “Terrible Place of Torture.”

This post was originally published as part of the Everybody’s Making Planes! (2024) newsletter.


  1. A Guide to the Makers of American Wooden Planes lists 1880 as the last year Ohio Tool used prison labor. However the firm was a contractor at the penitentiary through the end of the 1894 fiscal year. See Ohio State Auditor, Annual Report for the Fiscal Year Ending November 15, 1894 (J. L. Trauger, 1895), 56-57. In 1895, the firm still owed the state money for the use of convict labor in previous year(s), but Ohio Tool was no longer listed as a contractor. See Ohio State Auditor, Annual Report for the Fiscal Year Ending November 15, 1895 (J. L. Trauger, 1896), 8, 58. 

  2. Board of Directors of the Ohio Penitentiary, “Annual Report of the Directors And Warden,” in State of Ohio General Assembly, Annual Reports for 1868 (Columbus Printing Company, 1869), 2:539. 

  3. United States, Dept. of Labor. History Of Wages in the United States From Colonial Times To 1928. Bulletin no. 499, Wages And Hours Of Labor Series (Government Printing Office, 1929) . 

  4. An Act Related to Overwork in the Penitentiary and Moneys of Convicts. April 1, 1857. Public Statutes At Large of the Sate of Ohio. Ch. 1799. 

  5. “A Detailed Statement of the Receipts And Disbursements,” in Ohio State Auditor, Annual Report to the Governor Of The State Of Ohio for the Year 1867 (L. D. Myers & Bro, 1868), 5, 58-60. 

  6. Annual Report of the Directors And Warden, 1868. 

  7. Special Committee on Prison Labor, “Minutes Of Evidence,” in appendix to State of Ohio, Journal of the House Of Representatives of the State Of Ohio, 62nd General Assembly, Jan. 2, 1877, (statement of Jesse W. Dann, 85, and Alfred Thomas, 108). 

  8. E. C. Wines and Theodor W. Dwight, Report On The Prisons and Reformatories Of The United States And Canada (Van Benthuysen & Sons, 1867) 252.